Why should humans justify substituting ourselves for the natural cycle of life and death? A natural balance resists our intermeddling. It requires thriving populations of carnivorous, omnivorous, and herbivorous animals. Let them be! Deer do not need human management and control in ecosystems where wolves or coyotes and bobcats flourish. Let them flourish!
John Royle, Unsplash
Everywhere humans aim weapons at deer, there are also the calls for a
different style of erasure: capture and contraception.
The contraception debate asks how animals will be controlled. The assumption
it accepts? That they will be controlled.
When advocates become invested in unnatural "solutions" they enter that
perpetual struggle to become consultants in animal-control planning, while
insisting that the supposed lesser evil is helping animals. The deer, who
don't consent to any of these projects, are caught in a tug-of-war over
which is the better deer-erasure method in a given situation.
I regard this as parallel to the
Humane
Myth of agribusiness. Only here, the supposed lesser evil is
pharmaceutical control.
To my mind, forced contraception disrespects deer and their biological
communities.
Why should humans justify substituting ourselves for the natural cycle of
life and death? A natural balance resists our intermeddling. It requires
thriving populations of carnivorous, omnivorous, and herbivorous animals.
Let them be! Deer do not need human management and control in ecosystems
where wolves or coyotes and bobcats flourish. Let them flourish!
In a nutshell: Instead of promoting the chemical erasure of generations of
deer, advocacy would be better served by cultivating respect for wolves,
coyotes, and undomesticated cats.
At the end of the day, if everyone agrees that the deer require human
supervision and control, who champions the interest of deer in living free
of our heavy hands?Who makes a holistic argument to respect animals'
co-evolution in a given place over the centuries? Veganism,
by definition, respects the interest of nonhuman
animals to experience their natural course of evolution.
A MORSEL OF GOOD NEWS: I had an opportunity to weigh in
when local Quakers deliberated on whether to allow Radnor Township to impose
its deer control methods on the meetinghouse property in Villanova,
Pennsylvania. I'm pleased to report that the Quaker community, mindful of
its peace testimony, has told the township no.