Trapping is a cruel method of collecting animals for
fur. The most common method of trapping is the leghold trap used by some
80% of trappers. This trap clamps the leg of the animal and is secured
to prevent the animal from escaping. The trapper comes along later and
kills the animal, most commonly by clubbing or shooting. Commonly
trapped animals include mink, raccoon, skunk, coyote, fox and beaver.
Trappers are business people, not sportsmen. They are in this for money
and that creates a number of problems.
Trappers claim to be useful in controlling animal
populations...not so. Game departments have no way of predicting the
amount of animals that trappers will take since it is a business. When
fur prices are down...so are trappers. Fur prices usually go down when
animal populations go up... simple supply and demand economics...so they
cannot be effective in any predictable way in population control.
Trappers do not contribute to PR taxes with the equipment they use...so
they cannot claim to be "paying for conservation" as hunters do. They
are basically freeloaders taking from OUR resources and giving nothing
in return. Traps themselves are a cruel method for animals to die. After
the animal is caught it is exposed to many dangers until it is killed.
Predators are just one of these dangers. Rather than "preventing"
diseases like rabies, trapping can actually increase exposure to other
animals. If a sick animal is caught, it is held where it can be exposed
to any dogs, cats or other wild animals that come along, rather than
being able to escape.
Now as to fur itself...fur produces no heat...it is an
insulator, not a heat source. The animals metabolism provides heat by
converting food into energy...the fur holds it in...more correctly, fur
is part of the SYSTEM that holds it in. The fur that people wear is
commonly known as "guard hairs". The thick, woolly hair that lies
underneath is removed by the furrier. That is the true insulator of the
fur...that is also what you see an animal "shedding" in the spring. The
layer of fat is also an insulator, and of course that is removed also.
The long soft guard hairs are actually there to whisk away
moisture...and to increase surface area for cooling in the summer. What
we are left with is the animals cooling system... not his insulation.
Therefore, fur is not a good insulator when compared to the way it is
supposed to function. Fur is also not nearly as good as synthetics on
the environment. Synthetics are much more efficient than fur at
That is why our homes are insulated with fiberglass and
not recycled hair from the barber shop. Most all synthetics are
by-products of oil production. Oil is mined for gasoline and heating
fuels, mainly...it is NOT mined for fabric. When gasoline and fuel oils
are refined, certain WASTE products are produced...these can be dumped
in the environment...or used for other products. Chemical companies BUY
this waste from the refineries and produce useful products from it.
Thereby REDUCING the waste placed in the environment. Were it not for
oil BY-products we would have much MORE toxic waste...not less.
Now, fur..in theory fur is environmentally
friendly....but not in practice. Fur IS biodegradable...SO biodegradable
that it must be preserved...And waterproofed, to a point and the hide
must be tanned. Chemicals are used for this...silicones and
TriCloroethene are the most common..also Toluene. ALL very dangerous and
toxic chemicals. Then the coats and other articles receive a synthetic
liner and insulation, because fur really isn't that good at insulating
as we get it. So there is no PRACTICAL reason for fur. And therein lies
our argument..most fur buyers could care less about animal
cruelty....but if you can convince a fur buyer that synthetics are a
better value...he may not buy fur. And what do WE care WHY they DON'T
buy fur? Look at it this way....you can buy a fur coat... or you can buy
an excellent synthetic coat for 10% of the cost... and heat your entire
home for several years with the savings!!!! Turn up the thermostat!!!!
Think of that!!!! You can have an excellent coat and heat for your home
for the price of a fur coat...and synthetics save more too. No special
cleaning or storage costs. Synthetics are the way to go!!!!!!
Environmentally friendly, inexpensive, efficient.
The oil industry has problems ... no doubt. But not
buying synthetics is not the way to correct their problems. The oil
industry does not make synthetics...they make waste, chemical companies
make synthetics. NOT buying synthetics would raise oil prices...and
increase waste disposed. Now if we mined oil FOR synthetics, it would be
a different story. But we don't. Imagine if someone came to your home
and PAID you for the trash that you threw in a landfill... then made
something useful from it and sold it for a profit...would that be bad or
good for the environment?
This is an argument for ARAs to use other than
ethics..it may work to convince more people...and that is the goal.
Go on to Website
of the Week
Return to 25 August 1999 Issue
Return to Newsletters
** Fair Use Notice**
This document may contain copyrighted material, use of which has not been
specifically authorized by the copyright owners. I believe that this
not-for-profit, educational use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the
copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright
Law). If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your
own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright