Since the beginning of "civilized" society, man has
pondered the many mysteries of the world. Where did we come from? Why
are we here? What is our purpose in being? Religion has helped millions
of individuals to answer many of these questions, but at the same time,
has encouraged endless arguments and debates. Does God really exist? Is
there a heaven? Is there a hell? Do I have a soul? Do animals have
souls?
According to most texts and belief systems, a soul is a
form of metaphysical essence or life that is immortal and lasts
throughout eternity. Most religions agree on the idea that humans
possess some form of soul. Whenever animals are introduced into this
topic of discussion, there is an immediate separation among most faiths.
The departure ranges from those Eastern religions that believe both
animals and humans possess souls of equal importance, to systems like
Christianity, which entertain the belief that only humans possess
eternal souls.
This is an important topic for animal rights because
literally millions of people around the globe place an enormous amount
of faith in their religions. As a result, such individuals usually live
their lives in the manner taught by their relevant scriptures. It is not
difficult to envision the implications of a religion that teaches its
followers that they are spiritually superior to all other creatures and
vice versa.
On the one end, we have religions like Jainism and
Hinduism. Hinduism teaches an ethic of non-violence, known as "ahimsa."
It is believed that, by practicing a lifestyle that injures no other
being, a devout Hindu will achieve harmony with the environment, peace
amongst people, and kindness within the self. Hindus acknowledge that,
not only do animals have feelings, but they also have souls that
reincarnate as different life forms. Consequently, Hindus have advocated
vegetarianism for literally thousands of years, as well as a peaceful
attitude towards all of Earth's creatures, human and non.
Jains also practice a belief of the non-violent
"ahimsa." This is directly related to the Jain belief that animals
possess souls with equal status of humans. While Jains constitute less
than 1 percent of India's populace, they successfully provide over fifty
percent of the country's public welfare. In addition, each and every one
of the seven million Jains in India claim to accept a vegetarian
lifestyle, demonstrating Jainism's primary doctrine that it is immoral
to kill or injure any living being. Jain monks are so serious about this
fundamental principle that they sometimes wear masks in order to avoid
accidentally inhaling insects. Others brush the footpaths in front of
them in order to avoid stepping on any insects.
Other Eastern religions share similar beliefs. For
instance, the First Precept of Buddhism says, "Do not kill, but rather
preserve and cherish all life." This doctrine has a direct correlation
to the Buddhists' belief that all creatures possess an unchanging soul
that, when the physical body dies, returns to this Earth in a more
progressed body. Therefore, every form of life on Earth possesses an
intelligence and value that is to be respected. As a result, most
Buddhists seek humane fairness, regard for the Earth, and kindness for
animals. Vegetarianism is also a common lifestyle for many Buddhists.
Most Eastern religions promote a respect of all life,
human and non. The correlation between these particular religions is
that they each believe that at some level, animals do possess a soul or
spirit that is directly connected to a higher power that is shared with
humans.
On the other end of the spectrum we have Western
religions and traditions. While the scriptures of Western faiths possess
a small number of references towards animals and their connection with a
higher power, most believers of Western religions chose to ignore the
minimal and pay homage to those messages that receive the majority of
attention; i.e. those scriptures which appear to place man at a superior
level above all non-humans. For instance, Judaism believes in different
levels of soul. At the one end is "nefesh," the animal soul, which
represents a breathing, functioning part of the being that leaves upon
death of the physical body. At the other end is "neshuma," the spiritual
soul that is eternally connected to God. This level of soul is
restricted entirely to human beings.
While Jewish belief directs its followers to prevent
cruelty to animals, the Genesis creation story gives man "dominion" over
all creatures that are non-human. This scripture, combined with the
belief that animals are spiritually insuperior to humans, equips a
Jewish follower with the ammunition necessary to defend his or her right
to eat meat, to condone the testing of products on animals, and to
pardon any other ill-treatment of animals when it is for the higher good
of man. This is all despite the fact that many biblical passages promote
a higher level of respect for animals. For instance, Proverbs 12:10
says, "A righteous man cares for his beast" and Isaiah 66:3 reads, "He
who slaughters an ox is like him who kills a man." However, contemporary
doctrine and interpretation of the scriptures have created a belief
system that overlooks these particular testaments in order to create a
system that accepts that which man has chosen for himself, not which he
was directed to do according to his religion.
Christianity has followed much the same path as Judaism;
creating their own belief system as a result of individual
interpretation of the scriptures of the Bible. However, the distinct
difference between Christians and Jews in regard to animals, is that
Christianity does not acknowledge a soul in animals what-soever. There
were eccentrics, such as St. Francis of Assisi, who believed that
animals have immortal souls, but the Creation story has set the tone for
the Christian belief that animals do not possess souls. The commonly
referred to passage in Genesis, which gives man "dominion" over animals,
is used time and time again to defend the Christians' right to use
animals to their own gain, whether or not it be to the animal's
detriment.
In all actuality, the word dominion is derived from the
root Hebrew verb "yorade," which means, "to have communion with." So,
here we see that one man's interpretation has corrupted an entire system
of belief. Deep within the Bible are passages that promote love and
peace for all of God's creations. While the sanctioned Christian
passages basically reflect a belief system developed by the gentile
Christians, who were less than sympathetic towards animals, the
unauthorized scriptures strongly indicate that Jesus was very disturbed
by the ill treatment of non-human animals.
The reason that the religion debate is so important to
animal rights activists is that so many of those who ignore the pleas or
downplay the importance of animal rights use their religious backgrounds
to defend their right to use animals for whatever reasons they see fit.
Many ethicists will agree that those faiths that place man in a
spiritually superior level to animals have deeply influenced the way man
has treated the animal kingdom.
Many religions contain clear messages that animals do
possess souls and therefore, should be treated with a level of
importance equal to humans. With most Eastern religions, the followers
must either respect their doctrines or leave themselves open to
accusations of hypocrisy. Their word then becomes less reliable. On the
other hand, religions like Christianity and Judaism have equipped their
followers with the ammunition necessary to continue to allow the sort of
destruction and disrespect that has been plagued upon the non-human
species for thousands of years.
The fact that most of the world's religious people are
Christian or of some other Biblical faith should be a very concerning
thought for animal rights activists. Most followers have not only
created a thought in their mind that it is morally alright to exploit
animals for human gain, but they have what they believe to be
irrefutable proof that what they do is alright. However, what we have
briefly seen in the writings above is that these faiths have major
loopholes. If we wish to have our arguments ready when they tell us that
"God has given man dominion over animals" and "The Bible tells us that
it is alright to eat animals" and whatever other excuses they come up
with to defend their right to exploit animals, we have sources out there
that show them otherwise. Our sources are their very own scriptures from
which they derive their excuses. If we are to be best equipped to fight
this continuous argument when it comes up time and time again, we need
to equip ourselves with the evidence that is out there but is all to
often overlooked.
For more information visit: http://www.jesusveg.com/index2.html
There are also many well-written books in the animal
rights arena that attack this issue. One very good text is "The
Slaughter of Terrified Beasts ~ A Biblical Basis for the Humane
Treatment of Animals" by J.R. Hyland.
Go on to FDA Inspectors Slam Science Conducted at Coulston Lab
Return to 10 November 1999 Issue
Return to Newsletters
** Fair Use Notice**
This document may contain copyrighted material, use of which has not been
specifically authorized by the copyright owners. I believe that this
not-for-profit, educational use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the
copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright
Law). If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your
own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright
owner.