by Reporter: Craig Cheatham, News 4
http://www.kmov.com/news/News_stories/NEWS_010209_politics_of_puppies.html
Near Rolla (KMOV) -- Missouri is the puppy mill capital
of the United States. Every year tens of thousands of Missouri puppies
are shipped to pet stores all over the country. News 4 has uncovered
disturbing information about the way Missouri inspects those kennels.
"The expressions that you see on the faces of some of
these animals are haunting," says former USDA inspector Marshall Smith.
The front line in the war on puppy mills keeps moving
from backyard kennels to cyberspace. Kim Townsend uses the internet to
collect tips and trace records then posts them on her website
nopuppymills.com. "It's almost become an addiction," says Townsend.
Her addiction is attracting unprecedented attention from
the Department of Agriculture. At a meeting of the Missouri Pet Breeders
last year, G.A. Salmon, the head of the state inspection office
challenged 300 breeders to not let one woman ruin the industry.
"Now you know our friend on the internet and I use that
term loosely... this is a lady who says she's going to put you all out
of business. Let us not let a few people put you out of business," said
Salmon. At the same meeting people distributed letters with Kim
Townsend's phone number, address and a map to her home. Salmon's boss,
Dr. John Hunt, the Director of Missouri's Animal Health Division, sees
nothing wrong with Salmon's actions. "I've got full confidence in G.A..
I hired him and I take full responsibility for hiring him," says Hunt.
Missouri has more than one thousand animal breeders
licensed by the Federal government, one out of every three puppy mills
in the entire country. Why do we have so many? Former federal inspector
Marshall Smith says puppy mills are easy to run, can be very profitable,
and the state does a poor job policing them. "I've seen dogs covered
with mange at kennels that had flawless inspection reports," says Smith.
We examined dozens of the worst cases in Missouri history. The state
Department of Agriculture never fined the owners a penny, never took
away their state licenses.
In the same cases, the USDA suspended or revoked the
federal licenses and handed out thousands of dollars in fines. "They
have twice as much time and manpower as we do," says Dr. Hunt. Marshall
Smith says they're protecting the industry. Smith says inspectors often
overlook repeated violations.
One kennel, owned by Glen Wilson, is licensed by the
USDA and Missouri Department of Agriculture. "The kennel has no shelter
for the animals, the metal cages are rusty and have sharp edges," says
Smith. The dogs appear to have no protection from the cold. One of the
men on the property drags a dog by the neck and slings it into a pen.
Four months before our visit, Missouri inspector Tom
Hawley made only one observation: all dogs needed to be identified. No
mention of eight-foot tall weeds, or any other problems identified by
Marshall Smith.
Breeding is in the blood of Tom Hawley and G.A. Salmon.
They owned kennels before becoming inspectors. Now, the same facilities
are in their wives' names. Hawley is also a regional President of the
Missouri Pet Breeders Association.
The USDA calls that a conflict of interest, Dr. Hunt
does not.
The state's growing interest in Kim Townsend intensified
last year. Investigators accused her of buying and selling dogs without
a license. They never charged her or required her to get a license. But
in her eyes the message is clear.
Based on information uncovered by News 4, Dr. Hunt has
reassigned G. A. Salmon and Tom Hawley to jobs that no longer allow them
to inspect puppy mills. In our interview Dr. Hunt promised to checkout
complaints about the Glen Wilson kennel "quickly." Hunt told us he has
the utmost confidence in
Marshall Smith's observations, but the Department of Agriculture still
hasn't found the time to visit the kennel.
Go on to VRG's Annual
Essay Contest
Return to 21 February 2001 Issue
Return to Newsletters
** Fair Use Notice**
This document may contain copyrighted material, use of which has not been
specifically authorized by the copyright owners. I believe that this
not-for-profit, educational use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the
copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright
Law). If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your
own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright
owner.