Animal
Rights
Online
Animal
Rights
Online

Newsletters
Animal Writes
sm
10 October 2001 Issue
P&G Lies

CONTACT: Barbara Stagno, IDA, 914-693-6559
Email: bstagno@ix.netcom.com
Animal Defense League of Cincinnati 513-219-3029
www.idausa.org 

P&G Shareholder's Meeting Targeted for Lack of Progress in Halting Needless Animal Tests

Cincinnati, Ohio - Displaying a banner reading "P&G: Where's the Progress?" activists against animal testing to confront participants at this year's Procter & Gamble shareholder meeting to address its lack of movement in eliminating these archaic, barbaric and unnecessary tests. The protest was to be held at Cincinnati Music Hall on 1243 Elm Street starting at noon on Tuesday, October 9.

In July 1999, P&G responded to the intense and ongoing public pressure over its reliance on animal testing by issuing a news release declaring the company was stopping animal tests. In fact, this proved nothing more than a very savvy public relations move to restore its reputation and win back customer support.

The new announcement carried all sorts of exceptions to P&G's so-called elimination of animal tests. The bottom line is that P&G's announcement only pertained to existing or reformulated products on animals. The company has continued to test new products and new ingredients on animals. In essence, this was not really any sort of breakthrough at all, but P&G hoped to appease consumers into believing it was taking the first step towards a final ban on animal tests.

Now, more than two years later, that misleading "first step" has progressed no further. Meanwhile, P&G was reported by the British media as having "lobbied intensely" to prevent the emerging laws passed by the European Union that will impose a total ban on animal tests on all cosmetic products in EU countries. This effort by P&G shows the company's true intent for perpetuating outdated and cruel animal tests.

Shocking, too, was the recent exposure that the Iams Corporation, a subsidiary of P&G, has been harming and killings dogs and cats, claiming to make a better brand of pet food. In dozens of painful and invasive experiments, the Iams Co., which manufactures the Iams/Eukanuba line of dog and cat foods, has caused hundreds of dogs and cats to suffer and sometimes die in the name of "nutrition research." These experiments were not designed to help the animals involved. These victims were all healthy animals who were used simply as disposable laboratory equipment.

In communications between In Defense of Animals (IDA) and Iams, the company claims it has stopped all such nutrition research in the last two years. However, it has not yet signed a letter that was presented to Iams in July, asking Iams to more specifically define what it will and will not do in animal experiments. Until such clarification is attained, IDA considers Iams to be sponsoring yet more pain and suffering on animals and will continue to urge consumers to boycott both P&G and Iams.

In Defense of Animals is an international, California-based animal advocacy organization dedicated to ending the abuse and exploitation of animals by defending their rights, welfare and habitats.

IN DEFENSE OF ANIMALS 131 CAMINO ALTO, SUITE E MILL VALLEY, CA 94941 415-388-9641

Go on to Strange Species
Return to 10 October 2001 Issue
Return to Newsletters

** Fair Use Notice**
This document may contain copyrighted material, use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owners. I believe that this not-for-profit, educational use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law). If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Home Page

Newsletters

Poetry

Quotations

Your comments and inquiries are welcome

This site is hosted and maintained by:
The Mary T. and Frank L. Hoffman Family Foundation
Thank you for visiting all-creatures.org.


Since date.gif (991 bytes)