The first study to provide detailed analyses of the
relationship between childhood animal cruelty and adult violent behavior
has been completed by a University of South Florida scientist and her
Offenders of violent crimes are significantly more likely
to have abused pets and stray animals in their childhood, according to the
study by USF professor Kathleen Heide and animal welfare expert Linda Merz-Perez.
The study is the first to provide both quantitative and
qualitative analyses of the correlation between childhood animal cruelty
and adult violent behavior. The results are published in Heide's recently
released third book, Animal Cruelty: Pathway to Violence Against People,
co-authored by Merz-Perez.
"We're not just talking about kicking a dog," Heide said.
"The violent offenders were far more likely as children to have committed
extreme acts of abuse against a family pet or neighborhood animals -- acts
that the average person would find abhorrent and somewhat gruesome."
Heide and Merz-Perez found that violent offenders also
showed a tendency toward abuse of wild and farm animals.
"We noticed in some cases that the type of abuse violent
offenders inflicted on an animal was similar to the type of act they later
committed on people," Heide said. "Also, violent offenders rarely
expressed any remorse for their actions or empathy for the animals."
The study underscores that early intervention following an
act of animal cruelty is imperative to helping ensure that adolescents do
not follow a path of violent behavior.
"In one instance, a non-violent offender related that he
had received a rifle as a birthday gift from his grandfather when he was a
boy. He wanted to see what the gun would do so he impulsively shot and
killed a neighbor's pig. His grandfather broke the gun and made the boy
work for a year on his neighbor's farm, feeding and caring for the pigs as
punishment," Heide said. "As a result, the participant developed tender
feelings and sincere remorse for these animals, and never did anything
like this again."
The only instances in which non-violent offenders had a
record of abusing domestic animals were in three cases where participants
used their animals in competitive dog fighting. These individuals did not
view the dogs as victims. Rather they saw their dogs as warriors,
according to Merz-Perez.
"These men exhibited pride in their animals, providing
them with food, shelter and medical care when necessary," Merz-Perez said.
"Given their cultural background and experiences, they thought it would
have been cruel not to let their dogs fight."
Heide is professor of criminology, a licensed mental
health counselor, and interim dean of arts and sciences at USF. Merz-Perez,
a USF alumna, is a certified animal control officer and former executive
director of the Humane Society of Shelby County, Alabama.
Go on to The Family Dog
Return to 4 April 2004 Issue
Return to Newsletters
** Fair Use Notice**
This document may contain copyrighted material, use of which has not been
specifically authorized by the copyright owners. I believe that this
not-for-profit, educational use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the
copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright
Law). If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your
own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright