After finding itself in the glare of the national media
spotlight, Gunnison Valley High School has apologized for using a homeless
dog in a school biology experiment.
The dog, who had been abandoned and was unclaimed after
two weeks, was going to be put down. So their biology teacher organized a
class in which the dog was cut open in front of the 16- and 17-year-old
girls so they could see the digestive system at work. After the surgery,
the dog was destroyed.
The story was broadcast on KTVX News and then made its way
into the national media, whereupon the school was surprised to find itself
facing some very unwelcome publicity and protests from around the country.
"We don't condone this," said Donald Hill, South Sanpete
School District assistant superintendent. "Our schools will not
participate in this again."
But the teacher stood by what he'd done, and even the
assistant principal's apology was somewhat half-hearted. "They did not
remove or dissect any parts. It was not barbaric, [but] we will have to
find a better way next time."
A "better way" to accomplish what, exactly? Any other
lessons we teach them in school or church about the sanctity of life and
family values are instantly undermined in a class like this, when we treat
living creatures as no more than objects to be sliced open, inspected and
Vivisection (cutting up live animals for experiments) has
long been abandoned by schools in the mainstream of education. Teachers
know that it's the thin end of a very dangerous wedge. Once life - any
life - is viewed with such disrespect, the door is open to all life being
"It just makes me sick," said student Sierra Williams to
KTVX News. Other students told their parents that their teacher was less
than sympathetic to their distress, telling them they simply needed to be
able to "handle" it. But what the students couldn't handle was not the
sight of blood or body parts. Had they been witnessing a heroic effort to
save a life, they would have reacted quite differently. Sure, many of us
are squeamish about watching surgery, but that's very different from the
horror and distress of these girls.
Young people learn some of their most important life
lessons from the way their parents and teachers treat animals. Even seeing
a family pet dropped off at the local shelter can be traumatic. When the
family runs into financial problems, and Mom and Dad decide they can no
longer keep Fido or Fluffy, it sends a very clear message to the youngest
child, who now finds himself at the bottom of the family hierarchy: "I may
Cruelty and disrespect to animals breed the same attitude
toward humans. In homes where animals are being abused, spouses and
children are almost always being abused, too. It's a well-known fact that
every serial killer ever captured has admitted to having started on
animals before graduating to people. And according to the pastor of the
high school boys who carried out the infamous massacre at the Columbine
High School a few years ago, the two boys were known to have practiced
first on birds.
Respect for life is fundamental to any civilized society.
It's why we surround the execution of a condemned criminal with certain
rituals - the last meal, the visit from the chaplain. And it's why, when a
lost, lonely, helpless dog is going to be killed, shelter workers do their
best to offer him or her a caring and dignified end.
We should be proud that the girls at Gunnison Valley were
horrified and upset at the school experiment they witnessed. They don't
need to learn to "handle" their reaction. They need to be guided by it.
In a world where the daily news is full of routine killing
and cruelty, we need to teach our children that kindness to animals builds
respect for all living creatures, and that this is the foundation of a
better world for all of us.
Michael Mountain is the president of Best Friends Animal Society in Kanab,
the nation's largest no-kill animal sanctuary.
Go on to The Foundations
of a Movement 2005
Return to 29 May 2005 Issue
Return to Newsletters
** Fair Use Notice**
This document may contain copyrighted material, use of which has not been
specifically authorized by the copyright owners. I believe that this
not-for-profit, educational use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the
copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright
Law). If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your
own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright