Frank and I met in an undergraduate anthropology class many years
ago. This was an elective course in general anthropology. Since that
time, when I occasionally read or see on TV anything related to
anthropology, I take notice.
And one of the things I’ve noticed is the emotional attachment that
some anthropologists appear to form to the cultures they study. Here’s
an example: An anthropologist studying an ancient Peruvian culture that
performed human sacrifices praises the artifacts unearthed. These are
detailed gold, silver, pottery pieces, and decapitation knives obviously
made by people who were highly skilled. The one theme that seems to
connect all this work is a portrayal of demons and demonic activity (my
interpretation). The fierce-looking faces of deities with exaggerated
features designed to intimidate, the naked men being led to slaughter,
the drinking of human blood, tell you something about this culture.
Yet the anthropologist uses his scientific distance, which appears
more akin to emotional attachment, to glorify this culture and to
compare the sending off of young men to battle in our culture with the
alleged willing sacrifice of those ancient men.
Come to think of it, humans still haven’t progressed very far if they
are still glorifying battles and killing, have they?