Comment by Dr. Stevan Harnad: "This was the reason I suggested feigning optimism even if we don’t feel it: Not to pretend the horrors are not horrors — monstrous, impardonable horrors — but to keep alive the only hope there is for the victims: that humanity can change for the better, as it has done in the past with slavery, racism, sexism and a lot of other wrongs we’ve done and have since rejected, despite the fact that they too were driven by three of the four Fs - Flavour, Fashion, Finance and Fun."
My mother and I watch a pig escape the slaughterhouse... “Pig Escapes
Slaughter” - artwork by
Sue Coe.
A Request: “Pretend to Be More Optimistic”
From UPC United Poultry Concerns
January 23, 2022
On January 11, I (Karen Davis) posted a comment to the Jan. 10 New
York Times article
In a First, Man Receives a Heart From a
Genetically Altered Pig. The comment sparked a critique by cognitive
science professor, Dr. Stevan Harnad, which is posted on his website
Skywritings.
Here is my comment, followed by Dr. Harnad’s critique, for which I
thank him very much.
“Every single objection to the experimental use of animals –
vivisection, genetic engineering, etc. –has been ignored and
overridden by the scientific industry, and this is not going to
change no matter how morally obnoxious, heartless and cruel to the
members of other species. The majority of human beings are
completely speciesist and regard (other) animals as inferior to
ourselves and fit to be exploited for human ‘benefit’ including mere
curiosity. Among the latest animal-abuse crazes is the
factory-farming of octopuses. Of course! We just HAVE TO BE ABLE TO
EAT THESE ANIMALS! The human nightmare is too overwhelming and it
cannot be stopped although those of us who care about animals and
object to how viciously we treat them must continue to raise our
voices.”
– Karen Davis
....
See Dr. Harnad's critique, Veda Stram's response to that, and his response to Veda HERE (PDF).