By ANDREW MARTIN - Associated Press
A California meat company on Sunday issued the largest
beef recall in history, 143 million pounds, some of which was used in
school lunch programs, Department of Agriculture officials announced.
The recall by the Westland/Hallmark Meat Company, based
in Chino, Calif., comes after a widening animal-abuse scandal that
started after the Humane Society of the United States distributed an
undercover video on Jan. 30 that showed workers kicking sick cows and
using forklifts to force them to walk.
The video raised questions about the safety of the meat,
because cows that cannot walk, called downer cows, pose an added risk of
diseases including mad cow disease. The federal government has banned
downer cows from the food supply.
Agriculture officials said there was little health risk
from the recalled meat because the animals had already passed
pre-slaughter inspection and much of the meat had already been eaten. In
addition, the officials noted that while mad cow disease was extremely
rare, the brains and spinal cords from the animals — the area most
likely to harbor the disease — would not have entered the human food
“The great majority has probably been consumed,” said
Dr. Richard Raymond, the Agriculture Department’s under secretary for
The video was embarrassing for the Department of
Agriculture, as inspectors are supposed to be monitoring slaughterhouses
for abuse. It surfaced after a year of increasing concerns about the
safety of the meat supply amid a sharp increase in the number of recalls
tied to a particularly deadly form of the E. coli pathogen.
There were 21 recalls of beef related to the potentially
deadly strain of E. coli last year, compared with eight in 2006 and five
in 2005. No one is quite sure what caused the increase, though theories
include the cyclical nature of pathogens and changes in cattle-feeding
practices caused by the ethanol boom.
The recall on Sunday was more than four times bigger
than the previous record, the 1999 recall of 35 million pounds of ground
beef by Thorn Apple Valley, federal officials said.
It was prompted by a Department of Agriculture
investigation that found that Westland/Hallmark did not always alert
federal veterinarians when its cows became unable to walk after passing
inspection, as required.
“Because the cattle did not receive complete and proper
inspection, F.S.I.S. has determined them to be unfit for human food and
the company is conducting a recall,” Agriculture Secretary Ed Schafer
said in a statement. F.S.I.S. is the Agriculture Department’s Food
Safety and Inspection Service.
Technically, the Department of Agriculture does not have
the authority to recall meat. However, it can withdraw its inspectors
from a plant, putting pressure on a company to issue a recall.
The company is recalling all its raw and frozen beef
products since Feb. 1, 2006. Of the 143 million pounds that were
recalled, 37 million went to make hamburgers, chili and tacos for school
lunches and other federal nutrition programs, officials said.
Cows that cannot walk are banned for use in the food
supply because they pose an added risk of mad cow disease, or bovine
spongiform encephalopathy, a fatal disease that eats away at the brain.
There have been three confirmed cases of infected cattle in this country
The announcement on Sunday was classified as a Class II
recall, indicating that the chances of health hazards were remote. Other
large recalls involving E. coli have been Class I recalls, indicating
that eating the product may cause serious health problems or even death.
Officials at Westland/Hallmark meat could not be located
on Sunday for comment.
Some critics pointed out that the recall exposed gaps in
the nation’s system for food safety.
“The recall is obviously the big news,” said Wayne
Pacelle, president and chief executive of the Humane Society. “The
longer-term problem is the inadequacies of the inspection system. How
can so many downers have been mistreated day after day within a U.S.D.A.
oversight system that was present at the plant?
“We need more boots on the ground at the plants,” he
The undercover video, shown on television and on YouTube
and other Web sites, has caused an uproar since its release.
The Department of Agriculture started an inquiry and
suspended the company as a supplier to federal nutrition programs. Steve
Mendell, president of Westland/Hallmark, said afterward that he was
“shocked and horrified” by the videos and voluntarily suspended
operations pending the outcome of the federal inquiry.
On Friday, the San Bernardino district attorney, Michael
A. Ramos, filed animal cruelty charges against two employees fired by
the meat company. Daniel Agarte Navarro was charged with five felonies
and three misdemeanors, and Luis Sanchez with three misdemeanors.
While acknowledging that most of the meat had been
eaten, agriculture officials said the recall was necessary to find all
the meat that had not been consumed and because the plant was not
following the rules.
“The reason for doing this is because the plant was not
in compliance with F.S.I.S. regulations, and therefore it is an unfit
product,” said Dr. Kenneth Petersen, assistant administrator for the
Department of Agriculture inspectors conduct
pre-slaughter inspections on all cattle on the day of slaughter. If an
animal becomes unable to walk, before or at the time it is presented for
slaughter, employees of the slaughterhouse are required to summon a
Department of Agriculture veterinarian.
The veterinarian then has the discretion to determine
whether the animal is fit for slaughter. The Department of Agriculture
contends that employees at Westland/Hallmark sometimes failed to notify
the veterinarian when animals could not walk after being inspected.
Agriculture officials said in a statement that they
thought the case was “an isolated incident of egregious violations to
humane handling requirements and the prohibition of non-ambulatory
disabled cattle from entering the food supply.”
The Department of Agriculture, which is responsible for
the safety of meat, poultry and eggs, has 7,800 inspectors who check
more than 6,200 plants. In 2007, the agency suspended 66 plants; 12 of
which were related to humane handling violations.
Ana Facio Contreras contributed reporting.
See information on
Return to Articles