Editing Out Controversy, ‘Nursing Standard’ Style
Like so many other magazines, the editors of this
publication appear terrified of frank, open, fair and honest fact. They
appear to be of that insipid variety akin to even so many ‘men of the
cloth’ which I sum up without difficulty as: moral jelly fish. In other
words, void of all backbone. Well, admittedly the Nursing Standard
allowed dear Cynthia O’Neill - of past Hillgrove fame - to submit a most
enlightening article – Good for them! – but when I submitted the
following below, you’ll be surprised to know how much of it they edited.
I appreciate that mine was a lengthy letter, but what appeared was far
shorter than other letters
As One’s Letter Was Sent ::
Dear Cynthia O’Neil is to be commended for affirming that animal
experimentation is bad for patients. I would even go a step further and
highlight how it is bad for all who condone, practice and promote the
same.
Indeed, as a retired hospital chaplain conversant with the
Judeo-Christian Faith, I see the wisdom behind those two symbolic trees
of Genesis: the tree of knowledge and the tree of life. Yes, of how in
God’s order the former must not be indulged in until the latter has been
well assimilated. Sadly,. However, we’ve so often put the cart before
the horse: we use our quest for knowledge and research to maim and
trample others rather than to protect the most vulnerable. Might becomes
right; wrongly balanced education turns little rascals in to big ones;
and, so often it applies to the outcome of research as well.
Let us never forget that the likes of a Dr Joseph Mangelle – one of a
whole host of others! – was a deeply respected member of his medical
fraternity; and one who always worked strictly within the laws of his
country. The fact was that he conveniently conditioned himself to
believe that the, mostly, Jewish inmates of the concentration camps were
vermin, as are mice and rats. Consequently, he could gratify his lowest
instincts through rationalizing that such research would possibly
benefit a ‘supposedly’ master race. Well, as we all know, by half a
century later history had pronounced its own just verdict
It is my contention that one-day history will pronounce a similar
verdict on all those who have profited through vivisection at the cost
of losing their very souls! Indeed, to horribly abuse weaker species
than our own – yes, and including those we conveniently refer to as
vermin! – is to blunt our noblest and most precious human qualities:
those virtues which the Good Book refers to as ‘fruits of the Holy
Spirit’. Indeed, to trample these under foot, and replace them with a
cold, clinical callousness. Is lethal indeed. It becomes but one step
away from premeditated cruelty.
The supreme analogy of Christianity is that of a member of a master
species being prepared to lay down his life for that of a much inferior
one: the Good Shepherd prepared to suffer and lay down his life in order
to rescue a wayward sheep! Consequently, more will be lost than gained
by furthering any form of research that is downright cruel. There have
to be better ways: those that a God of love can smile down upon in
blessing!
Surely if those decades used in cruel research had been dedicated to
humane alternatives, then we would not be in the heartless mess we have
ended up in today! This is not to say that one or two breakthroughs have
never occurred through pursuing cruel means. A few must have done; just
as was no doubt the case in those diabolic Nazi experimental blocks!
Yes, but surely – from a broader view – the reality of a greater loss
than blinkered one track minds could comprehend?.
It is not without significance that a past breed of consultants I
occasionally encountered - aloof, void of any bedside manner, and quite
contemptuous towards both nurse and patient alike – had been, previous
to their graduation, avid enthusiasts for animal expertimentation!
Consequently, I’m glad to learn of Cynthia O’Neill’s ‘Nurses Movement
For Responsible Medicine’. At a time when compassion, empathy and
sensitivity towards vulnerable patients needs to be the hallmark of NHS
practice, neither medics or nurses can afford to become desensitised
through condoning that barbaric, outmoded and morally obnoxious
pseudo-science: vivisection.
Rev. James Thompson
( Chaplain of St Luke’s General & PsychiatricHospital,
Huddesrsfield within the 1970s.
Senior Episcopal Chaplain Of Aberdeen Royal Infirmary,
Woodend General & Cornhill Psychiatric Hospitals within the 1980s)
As Ones Letter Was Published:
Cynthia O’Neill is right to argue that Animal
experimentation is bad for patients.. I am a retired hospital chaplain
and was pleased to learn that she has created: The Nurses Movement For
Responsible Medicine.
Compassion, empathy and sensitivity towards
vulnerable patients should be the hallmark of all health professional’s
practice. I do not believe such values are in keeping with vivisection.
- The Rev. James Thompson.
Go on to Next Topic
Return to Spring 2009 Issue
Return to
Newsletters