Non-animal research also promises faster delivery of test results with greater applicability to humans. The research industry, government agencies and other stakeholders must give proper weight to the environmental impacts of animal research when making decisions and considering alternatives to animal research.
A review of evidence uncovers significant — and often overlooked — negative environmental impacts of animal research.
Globally, up to 126.9 million non-human vertebrate animals are bred, used,
and disposed of in the drug, medical, chemical, cosmetic, and household
product industries. As in the farmed animal industry, this mass use of
animals as resources raises serious environmental impact concerns.
Companies in the U.S – the country that uses the most animals in research
and testing in the world – are not required to report the total number of
research animals used to the USDA. This makes environmental analysis
difficult, but it is still clear that a huge number of animals are used and
disposed of in the research industry. The few specific studies on the
environmental impact of animal research indicate that the use and disposal
of animals contributes to pollution, as well as harming biodiversity and
public health.
The researchers of this study set out to examine existing evidence of the
environmental impact of animal research, paying particular attention to:
Resources used in:
READ MORE at Animal Research: An Environmental Perspective
Rebekah is a PhD student researching the law and ethics of smart city technology. During her Master's in philosophy and public affairs, she completed a research project examining utilitarian justifications for the use of animals in science. Rebekah lives in Belfast, Northern Ireland, with her companion animal, Eugene, who is a happy and healthy FIV+ cat.
Return to Environmental Articles