ARCHIVE OF COMMENTS AND DISCUSSIONS
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
Our subjects cover: animals, religion (Christian, Jewish and others); diet and lifestyle (vegan and vegetarian); and other miscellaneous subjects.
Again, presumption is not evidence; on the basis of:
(a) just not knowing - nobody's knowing - AND
(b) PETA's disinterest in GETTING real data on 'numbers saved' NET (not gross, since we KNOW "anecdotally" that some folks have made SOME decisions on the basis of PETA's influence in THEIR individual lives),
I dispute (though I do not deny, I DISPUTE) any claim that NET numbers of animals saved is greater BECAUSE of PETA.
Again, I DO believe the offices of PETA can do SOME things relatively well; I do NOT think one ought EVER to write ANY organization OR person 'a blank check' of endorsement, and PETA has in some areas a very bad track record of offending the majority of folks on issues TANGENTIAL to our reasons for supporting them. I'd urge us to find someone else who can do the job better.
They FAIL to bring onto the same page the kinds of people who need to be endorsing pro-animal and vegan values.
Maynard S. Clark
Go on to: Comments by Betty - 28 May 2009
Return to: Animal Rights Activism: What's the Best Way?
Your Comments are Welcome:
| Home Page
| Discussion Table of Contents |
Watercolor painting by Mary T. Hoffman - God's Creation in Art
| Home Page | Animal Issues | Archive | Art and Photos | Articles | Bible | Books | Church and Religion | Discussions | Health | Humor | Letters | Links | Nature Studies | Poetry and Stories | Quotations | Recipes | What's New? |
Thank you for visiting all-creatures.org.