Examining the hidden impacts of factory farming and how a ballot measure in the heart of wine country could put us on a path to a more sustainable and healthier future... Considering the significant damages that CAFOs have historically inflicted upon animals and surrounding communities. Small family farmers are often the strongest adversaries of large, industrial-scale CAFOs.
Image from Tim Green, Wikimedia Commons
In a June article in Politico, the author of
“Animal rights comes to ‘America’s Provence’ and farmers are
worried” dives into the ongoing debate over Measure J
on Sonoma County’s November ballot, which seeks to bar the operation
and maintenance of concentrated (or confined) animal feeding
operations. The piece overlooks the significant damages that CAFOs
have historically inflicted upon surrounding communities and
animals.
The piece cites CAFO operators’ commitment to sustainable practices
and “compliance monitoring,” such as recycling manure by applying it
to agricultural land as a natural fertilizer. Such land
applications, however, frequently lead to groundwater contamination
through runoff. Sonoma County has the most wells per capita of any
California county, with around 23,000 properties relying on
groundwater from a private well for their water supply. Sonoma
County residents deserve access to clean water, uncontaminated by
manure.
These facilities also impact air quality and human health. A 2019
University of Wisconsin-Madison study corroborated previous findings
stating that the closer children lived to a CAFO, the more likely
they were to develop asthma. According to the California Air
Resources Board, one in six children living in California’s Central
Valley suffer from asthma.
Measure J offers a path to a more sustainable future for Sonoma County. Voting for Measure J this November would allow the county to lead by example—pushing for environmental and public health protections and making a collective effort to protect our environment and public health.
Asthmatic symptoms caused by hazardous contaminants are not the only
consequence of CAFO air pollution. CAFOs emit egregious amounts of
greenhouse gases that heavily contribute to climate change. Methane
and nitrous oxide emissions are 23 and 300 times more potent than
carbon dioxide as greenhouse gases, respectively. Animal agriculture
is the leading source of U.S. methane emissions, while agricultural
soil management is responsible for 75% of U.S. nitrous oxide
emissions, primarily because of the use of manure from animal
agribusiness.
CAFOs are also associated with the increased spread of
diseases—including avian flu—among animals and humans. In the
original article, farmer Mike Weber admitted that he had to kill all
550,000 chickens in December due to an outbreak. Several states have
recently suffered from avian flu outbreaks, 48 with affected poultry
and 12 with affected cattle. The extremely high-density environment
of a CAFO facilitates a quicker transfer of the virus, exacerbated
by wastewater that is often improperly treated and discharged. These
cruel conditions are a perfect storm for a public health disaster,
while also causing high levels of stress, discomfort, and illness
among the animals housed there.
Although the piece argues that Measure J would impede family farm
livelihood, it is actually the opposite. As a matter of fact, small
family farmers are often the strongest adversaries of large,
industrial-scale CAFOs. For example, family farmers in Iowa are
calling for reduced federal subsidies for large CAFOs in favor of
increased funding for conservation programs targeted at smaller
farms. These are not activists wanting to “eradicate animal farming
entirely.” The opposition to CAFOs is a community-led effort to
ensure all Californians get a cleaner and healthier food system and
environment.
Measure J seeks to prohibit the establishment, operation, expansion,
or maintenance of CAFOs in the unincorporated areas of Sonoma
County. This prohibition aims to protect the environment, safeguard
public health, and address environmental justice concerns. It even
provides existing CAFOs with a phase-out period of three years to
modify or cease operations.
The measure does not simply cast CAFO owners aside. It includes
provisions to ensure that farm workers receive the assistance and
training they may need to transition to government-sanctioned
agricultural operations. The measure does not require these animal
feeding operations to close outright but rather gives them a
three-year period to modify their operations so that they no longer
qualify as CAFOs. That time period presents the perfect opportunity
for owners to lean into sustainable agricultural practices, for
which Sonoma County has long been known. Sustainable approaches,
such as implementing pasture-based feeding and taking a circular,
whole-systems farming approach, are increasingly feasible,
economically viable, and almost always more humane.
Measure J offers a path to a more sustainable future for Sonoma
County. Voting for Measure J this November would allow the county to
lead by example—pushing for environmental and public health
protections and making a collective effort to protect our
environment and public health. It's time to prioritize human and
environmental health over industrial farming practices that harm our
communities, animals, and planet.