It was an ecosystem, at least in my mind, but it was one that existed without the realities of death. It didn’t occur to me that farmers killed the wildlife I loved. And I didn’t think about slaughterhouses.
As we move past summer solstice into harvest and an autumn respite
from the heat, something about this time of year makes us pay
attention to the cycles of death and decay. We march toward
Halloween, a specter of ghouls and spirits, and allow ourselves to
dance around the darker parts of life, from graveyards to crypts.
When it comes to farming, we dance around the reality of slaughter
too.
My hometown is the egg capital of the world, nicknamed “Chickaluma,”
famous for its butter and eggs parade. It’s well-known that around
the middle of the afternoon, coastal winds carry the smell of manure
across the town. The smell still has little effect on me as a
regular feature of my rural childhood.
Long before I understood the environmental effects of agriculture, I
understood animals. Growing up surrounded by dairies and chicken
coops, I spent hours walking through woods and pasture. I got to
know the trees, the wildlife, the water, the curves of the
landscape, the soaring birds above and, yes, the cows and chickens,
sheds, and fence line boundaries. It was an ecosystem, at least in
my mind, but it was one that existed without the realities of death.
It didn’t occur to me that farmers killed the wildlife I loved. And
I didn’t think about slaughterhouses.
The Center is one of the few leading environmental nonprofits that
boldly takes on slaughterhouse pollution. All animal agriculture
ends in slaughter, and although it’s rarely discussed as part of the
wool, dairy, or even meat industries, the thousands of slaughter
facilities that are operating now in the United States have an
enormous impact on wildlife and waterways.
The Center has long fought slaughterhouse pollution. In court we
challenge failures to protect workers, animals and the environment.
Recently, following successful litigation brought by the Center and
key allies in the 4th Circuit, the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency announced it will update water-pollution control standards
for the slaughterhouse industry. Meanwhile we continue to fight
efforts to waive line-speeds and otherwise weaken environmental
regulations on slaughter pollution.
Slaughter facilities release more than 55 million pounds of toxic
substances directly into waterways. A U.S. slaughterhouse may
produce as much nitrogen as untreated sewage from a city with 14,000
people. They top the charts as point sources for phosphorous and
nitrogen. This nutrient pollution impairs water quality, creating
dead zones and harming aquatic wildlife like eels, mussels, crabs
and crayfish.
Processing living farmed animals into meat products not only causes
enormous pollution and wastes water but also disproportionately
affects marginalized communities. Employees doing the difficult and
extremely dangerous work of slaughter are also often Black,
Indigenous, Latino, immigrant or from low-income households,
susceptible to inhumane workplace violations. Facilities that
discharge into waterways are often built near vulnerable, low-income
areas. The resulting air and water pollution leads to serious health
problems. Residents may be unable to even open windows or go
outside.
The horrors of slaughter are rarely discussed when industrial,
corporate agriculture dresses itself up in pastoral descriptions of
happy grass-fed livestock and family farms. But we need to take off
that mask and reveal the realities of meat production from start to
finish. We can’t avoid the less comfortable aspects of death as we
map out what sustainable food systems may look like. It’s only in
facing how we responsibly approach death that we can sustain an
ethical, ecological, healthy life.