©1998-2000 - The Mary T. and Frank L. Hoffman Family Foundation
Throughout the ages, we have accepted killing, violence,
and violent behavior as just being a part of life - it's time we change!
Violent Role Models:
Elizabeth - Queen of England
People want to look to their world leaders as role
models for themselves. They want to do the same things that their
leaders do. As a result, these leaders take upon themselves a very
serious moral responsibility, for in a very real way they hold the souls
of others in their hands. This is even more to the point with Queen
Elizabeth, because she is also the "Keeper of the Faith".
On 19 November 2000, Reuters, the "Sunday Mirror", and
the "Sunday People" all reported how Britain's 74 year old Queen
Elizabeth wrung the neck of a wounded pheasant. Her spokesperson said
that she did this as an act of mercy to put the injured bird out of its
agony. But was it really an act of mercy? Let's look at some of the
* The hunt took place on a royal estate in Norfolk,
* The hunt was sanctioned by the royal family.
* The royal family participated in the hunt.
* Approximately 200 pheasants were raised solely for the purpose of
being hunted on this estate.
* Queen Elizabeth wrung the neck of this pheasant with her bare hands
while watching Prince Philip and guests shoot the helpless birds.
I personally can see no way that this act of
premeditated killing, or any aspect of the event (the wringing of the
pheasant's neck) could be classified as merciful. The hardness of Queen
Elizabeth's heart is evidenced by the fact that she could sit or stand
by while her husband and his friends brutally shot and killed these
birds, and then be able to wring the neck of this particular pheasant
with her own hands.
As a reigning monarch, she could have set an example of
compassionate living, but she chose to do otherwise. She chose to
support cruelty and violence in our world society. As the Keeper of the
Faith, she is to present the message of peace offered by the Prince of
Peace, Jesus Christ, but she chose to do just the opposite.
In 1776 an Anglican priest, Dr. Humphrey Primatt, wrote,
"A Dissertation on the Duty of Mercy and the Sin to Brute Animals." In
it he said, "We may pretend to what religion we please, but cruelty is
atheism. We may boast of Christianity; but cruelty is infidelity. We may
trust in our orthodoxy; but cruelty is the worst of heresies." If I
apply this Anglican priest's definition to the acts of Queen Elizabeth
and Prince Philip, I come to the conclusion that they are atheistic,
I heard one woman respond to this news report, "We must
have a very cruel God to allow such things to take place." Her remark
reminded me of what Nathan said to another "keeper of the faith", King
David, in reference to his affair with Bathsheba, "...because of this
deed you have given occasion to the enemies of the Lord to blaspheme..."
(2 Samuel 12:14 NASV). In this case, Queen Elizabeth's action caused
even a believer to doubt and question God's intent (a form of
blaspheming). Or as Paul wrote to the Romans in 2:24, "The name of God
is blasphemed among the Gentiles because of you." So much for Elizabeth
being "the Keeper of the Faith".
It's time that we stop shooting ourselves in the foot.
It's time we stop sanitizing violence in our society under the guise of
"sport". It's time we call it what it really is, Legalized Premeditated
Go on to Don't Let
Donna's Memory Fade
Return to 29 November 2000 Issue
Return to Newsletters
** Fair Use Notice**
This document may contain copyrighted material, use of which has not been
specifically authorized by the copyright owners. I believe that this
not-for-profit, educational use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the
copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright
Law). If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your
own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright