Our subjects cover: animals, religion (Christian, Jewish and others); diet
and lifestyle (vegan and vegetarian); and other miscellaneous subjects.
So let me get this straight. You guys don't like what the King James version of
God's Word says so you think that the parts you don't like, such as the fact
that Abel sacrificed an animal, must have been written by lying scribes. Those
references to God clearly telling the Children of Israel to kill the Passover
lamb, and Jesus giving people fish to eat MUST have been forgeries. C'mon, you
guys can do better than that. You don't really expect reasonably intelligent
people to buy this do you? I read the one where the guy talked about the animal
skins that God gave Adam and Eve to cover their nakedness were made out of thin
air. Really? If they were animal skins, didn't they have to come from an animal?
To say that the skins were created out of thin air misses the whole point. Sin
is an ugly thing. It demands death. In Old Testament times it required the death
of animals as a temporary covering for sin. This gave God's people a picture of
just how ugly sin is. When Jesus came and died, He was the perfect offering for
sin. There is no further need for sacrifice. We just need faith in Him. And, yes
Jesus could have created fish out of thin air, but they are still fish. He still
gave them to people to eat. Either the King James Version of the Bible is God's
Word or it isn't. You can't have it both ways. But if He inspired the writers,
couldn't he have also inspired the translators? You can't just take out the
parts you don't like or twist parts to make it say what you want it to say. You
have to take it straight up.
Thanks,
Anthony Simmons